Cyberlux Corporation might want to hire a new legal strategy team—or at least set a few calendar reminders. The embattled company is at the center of lawsuits across the country, and its approach seems to consist mostly of radio silence. While Plaintiffs like Atlantic Wave Holdings and Aerotek barrel forward, Cyberlux is sitting idle, collecting court losses like trading cards.
A Texas-Sized Defeat
The most recent gut punch came in Harris County, Texas, where Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, and Secure Community, LLC, apparently scored a decisive win in their case to enforce a foreign judgment. After months of motions, hearings, and filings, the court finalized the case on December 31, 2024, with Atlantic Wave holding a $1.4 million ticket to collect.
Cyberlux tried its best to fight back—filing for a protective order to dodge questioning—but the court apparently shut that down faster than a bad Yelp review. The Plaintiffs didn’t waste time celebrating; on January 3, 2025, they filed a request for a writ of execution.
In Texas, a writ of execution is like the legal version of sending in the repo crew. When someone refuses to pay up after a court ruling, this nifty little order gives law enforcement the green light to swoop in and seize non-exempt property—think cars, bank accounts, or other valuables. Of course, Texas law isn’t heartless; your home, your cowboy boots, and a few other essentials are off-limits. But for everything else? It’s fair game, making this the courtroom equivalent of “pay up, or we’re taking it.”
Elsewhere: Crickets
While the Texas case wraps up, Cyberlux is leaving a trail of unanswered lawsuits and dormant cases across the country. If inaction were a legal strategy, Cyberlux would be its poster child.
1. Aerotek vs. Datron and Cyberlux – North Carolina
Aerotek filed suit in Wake Superior Court on October 29, 2024, and Cyberlux’s response has been… nonexistent. This kind of ghosting isn’t just rude; it’s an open invitation for a default judgment.
2. Cyberlux vs. Atlantic Wave – Virginia
Cyberlux launched two cases against Atlantic Wave in Richmond, Virginia, but apparently decided to take a long nap afterward. No filings. No motions. No progress since July 2024. At this point, even the court docket must be getting bored. A hearing is scheduled for the end of March.
3. Richmond Original Case – January 24 Hearing
Meanwhile, in the original Richmond case, a hearing is scheduled for January 24, 2025. Adding a little spice to the docket is an “unentered” order—basically a Schrödinger’s cat of legal filings. Whether this hearing will shake Cyberlux from its stupor is anyone’s guess.
4. Atlantic Wave vs. Cyberlux – San Diego Federal Court
Over in sunny California, Cyberlux’s federal case with Atlantic Wave has been quiet since September 3, 2024. Four months without a filing is less “strategic pause” and more “forgotten email draft.” Meanwhile, plaintiffs have continued to provide status updates to the court.
5. RB Capital vs. Cyberlux – San Diego Federal Court
In another San Diego case, this time filed by RB Capital, Cyberlux hasn’t made a peep since November 27, 2024. At this rate, the court might want to send a wellness check.
A Corporate Mystery
So, what’s the deal? Is Cyberlux playing some kind of 4D legal chess, or is the company simply out of moves? The company’s inertia is puzzling—and risky. Ignoring lawsuits doesn’t make them go away; it just makes default judgments more likely. And for a company with Plaintiffs lining up across the country, that’s a very expensive gamble.
The pattern of inaction paints a picture of either strategic withdrawal, financial trouble, or sheer disorganization. Whatever the reason, Cyberlux’s silence is emboldening Plaintiffs like Atlantic Wave and Aerotek, who seem more than happy to turn up the pressure.
What’s Next?
The January 24 hearing in Richmond is shaping up to be a pivotal moment. Will Cyberlux finally rejoin the fight, or will the pattern of inactivity continue? Meanwhile, the writ of execution in Texas signals that Atlantic Wave is gearing up to collect—whether Cyberlux likes it or not.
For now, Cyberlux’s legal troubles look less like a defense strategy and more like a slow-motion trainwreck. Stay tuned—this legal drama isn’t done yet.
Grab your popcorn. It’s about to get interesting.
All posts, articles, and op-eds about Cyberlux Corporation are grounded entirely in information sourced from publicly available court records, government documents, and financial disclosures filed with OTC Markets. This content is intended for informational purposes only—it’s not legal advice, it’s not financial guidance, and it’s definitely not an invitation to dive headfirst into investment decisions. Our interpretations, opinions, and conclusions stem exclusively from these accessible resources. Ultimate adjudication of legal matters rests with the courts and qualified legal professionals. As always, you’re encouraged to verify independently because, let’s face it, trust but verify is a motto that never goes out of style. If you believe there is an error in our reporting and have verifiable proof, we encourage you to present it, and we will promptly review and address any inaccuracies.
Personal Insults don’t change facts.
